Upbit’s $32M Heist: North Korea or Just a Bad Day?

Upbit, the self-proclaimed king of crypto exchanges, discovered some suspicious activity in their Solana wallet and decided to panic like it’s 2025. 🐲

About $32 million in Korean won (which, let’s be honest, is just a drop in the bucket for a crypto exchange) vanished in late November 2025. Upbit, ever the hero, paused deposits and withdrawals and promised to repay users from their own pockets… or maybe just from their own pocketbook. 💸

Suspected North Korean Ties

Authorities are now suspecting the Lazarus Group, a cyber gang with ties to North Korea. Because nothing says „I’m a villain“ like a group named after a mythical creature. 🐲

Security experts are pointing to methods that look suspiciously like the 2019 heist where they stole 342,000 ETH. Coincidence? I think not. Or maybe they just have a thing for Solana. 🧠

Officials say the pattern of rapid withdrawals, quick cross-chain transfers, and spreading funds across many wallets matches tactics used in past nation-linked operations. Because nothing says „we’re lazy“ like using the same playbook every time. 🔄

today south korea blamed north korea for the upbit hack
nice headline
but that part came later
so what actually happened?
an unknown attacker drained a few of upbit’s hot wallets
waited a bit
then started moving funds across chains
at some point the hacker bridged usdc from…
– trix (@trixwtb) November 28, 2025

How The Funds Were Moved

The stolen tokens were moved off Solana, converted through several bridges, and routed through multiple chains to make tracking harder. It’s like the crypto version of a game of cat and mouse, but the cat is a hacker with a PhD in blockchain. 🧩

Transfers happened fast and in many small transactions, which complicates tracing attempts on the blockchain. Blockchain analysts are combing transaction histories, but the bridge conversions and mixing steps slow down any straightforward recovery efforts. Because nothing says „I’m a professional“ like making it impossible to find your money. 🕵️♂️

Authorities have launched inspections at Upbit’s systems and are reviewing logs, admin access records, and wallet backups. Because nothing says „we’re trustworthy“ like letting investigators poke around your servers. 🔍

According to sources close to the probe, investigators suspect an admin credential compromise or impersonation rather than a simple software flaw in Upbit’s servers. Because if it’s not a hacker, it’s definitely a disgruntled employee. 🧑‍💼

While evidence is still being gathered, forensic teams are looking for the entry point used to sign the withdrawal transactions and any indicators of outside control. Because if it’s not a hack, it’s definitely a glitch. 🤔

The timing of the theft drew attention because it coincided with corporate news: Upbit’s parent, Dunamu, had public talk of a merger with Naver valued at about $10.3 billion. Coincidence? Maybe. Or maybe the hackers just wanted to ruin someone’s big day. 🎉

Market players noted the coincidence, and some suggested the attack could aim to distract or unsettle stakeholders. For investors, exchanges, and regulators, the incident renews calls for stricter custody controls, better separation of hot and cold wallets, and clearer rules for large crypto platforms. Because nothing says „we’re serious“ like demanding more rules after a hack. 📜

Yonhap News reports that South Korea’s largest crypto exchange, Upbit, suffered a hack worth about 44.5 billion KRW ($32 million). Authorities are investigating whether North Korea’s Lazarus Group was behind the attack. The group was also linked to Upbit’s 2019 theft of 58…
– Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) November 28, 2025

Upbit has pledged full reimbursement to users hit by the theft and says it will share findings when the probe allows. Based on reports, tracing and recovery work is ongoing but will be slow because of how the assets were fragmented and moved across chains. Because nothing says „we’re on top of it“ like taking months to recover stolen funds. ⏳

Watchers say confirmation of Lazarus involvement would mark another example of how state-linked actors continue to target major crypto firms. Because nothing says „we’re a threat“ like hacking exchanges for fun. 🐲

Authorities have not yet publicly released a definitive attribution. The next steps to watch include any formal statements from prosecutors, whether any of the moved funds are frozen or returned, and how regulators will respond to reduce the chance of similar losses. Because nothing says „we’re proactive“ like waiting for the dust to settle. 🧹

Weiterlesen

• EUR AED PROGNOSE

• EUR USD PROGNOSE

• EUR JPY PROGNOSE

• EUR CHF PROGNOSE

• GBP USD PROGNOSE

• EUR AUD PROGNOSE

• USD JPY PROGNOSE

• EUR TRY PROGNOSE

• EUR RUB PROGNOSE

• EUR PHP PROGNOSE

2025-11-29 01:41